Digital Identities within the LGBTQ Community
Identity is no longer
something that exists in the physical sense. With the increase of digital
technology, we now have digital
identities. “The digital world has created a new domain separate and yet
embedded within several aspects of our lives—a domain where one can create an
identity as one uses those technological features and contributes to the
digital world, whether one knows it or not”[1].
This domain has acted as a platform to speak for and against causes, to create
connections across space and time, and to learn more about the self through
interacting with the interaction of technology.
Digital identities do not just belong to one person. A digital
identity belongs to everyone. The individual is never entirely individual.
There are external forces at play that either work for or against them. “Identities
as narratives are never created out of whole cloth, never uniquely individual,
but rather each narrative is a retelling, an act of social interaction, a
positioned intervention in the shared, contested narratives of a given culture”[2].
There are so many limits set upon each person based off
race, culture, economic class, region, family relations, sexual orientation,
gender, etc. While some may argue that they determine who they are in spite of
those limits, society still plays such a large role in how a person begins to
define themselves and how they are defined by the outside world. Society labels
others under certain categories. When seen under a particular classification,
there are numerous of stereotypes, discriminations, advantages, privileges,
etc. that direct which path that an individual is able to walk.
Within the LGBTQ community, there have been many instances
where an individual’s voice online is the only means by which others will hear
what they need to say. From coming out videos on YouTube to advocating for
political change—the LGBTQ community has found that they can create an identity
that is validated and seen through
digital media. Although there are still many who discriminate and abuse,
digital media has allowed for the LGBTQ community to create a rhetorical space
where individuals can be remembered, become stronger individuals, and create a
positive change for those who have been marginalized for their sexual
orientation.
Marginalization of the LGBTQ Community
Heteronomativity is the framework by which society is built
upon. Any sexual orientation or swaying from the gender binary is abnormal. For
individuals in the LGBTQ community, their “abnormality” in sexual orientation
or gender identification has left them to experience numerous discriminations,
violence, stereotypes, and omission from history.
When being discriminated against, the LGBTQ community has
been known to take the blame for their ridicule and abuse. For example, in a World of Warcraft, an online blog was
created to support the LGBTQ players of WoW. When they were banned to prevent
potential abuse, one user supportive of this ban defended the action by
claiming, “You can do 2 things to prevent abuse: either do not provoke them by
not advertising as LGBTQ friendly, or just ignore the bigots”[3].
Thus, those who are a part of this community must hide their true identity
because they are part of a group of people that do not follow the
heteronormative framework of a game that does not require for the characters to
be gendered. This is just one instance of how the LGBTQ community has been
marginalized online. Structuring these individuals as responsible for their
abuse takes away responsibility from a society that is unaccepting of diversity.
Although the LGBTQ community may be the minority, it does not imply that they
are inferior to the majority.
The LGBTQ community has taken steps to begin to make
homosexuality and gender fluidity not just a tolerated but an accepted part of
society. Much of this work has been done through digital media as individuals
have forged and sustained minority identities.
Making the Invisible Visible
Microblogging
Microblogging is the practice of posting online through
text, photos, or videos. It also includes the sharing, or reblogging, of
material that may or may not be your own. With this, content is seen by more
than just an individual’s inner circle—it is accessible to all of the public. Online
sites have become a means by which minority groups are able to counter the
narrative of the past that may have been omitted. In the LBGTQ community, there
are histories that are more than just the official historical records and
archives that we currently have.
One form of microblogging allows for online identities to combat/contrast
what an identity is perceived as offline. Termed lifestreaming—“a rhetorical
act of streaming documents, texts, and visuals to curate an imagined and real
self”—individuals post material they feel embodies who their true selves are
while simultaneously combatting inequality2. With the advancement of
technology, social media has turned digital photography into a literacy
practice. Lifestreaming is both an archive and an outlet for political, social,
and personal change. The moment someone posts a selfie, a status, or blog,
their story becomes accessible to the public. Through this digital literacy
practice, we see that “there’s an identity beyond the physical body”2.
Tumblr is one of the more well-known forms of microblogging.
In this website, photographs and texts are used as a means for many individuals
to provide counter-narratives to the identities that society has given them.
One group of individuals in the LGBTQ community who has taken advantage of this
form of identity creation is the younger generation. As LGBTQ youth,
lifestreaming has opened up the opportunity to provide “topographies of visual
representation to write a self that felt most real to them. Identities in which
their sexuality and gender, alongside of their youth status, were not
peripheral to their everyday lives, but central”2. Many youth see
the discrimination taking place or are experiencing bullying for their sexual
orientation. Lifestreaming opens up an avenue to express themselves to people
who may be more accepting than those they experience in the physical world and
also offers an opportunity to change the narrow views of those around them.
Social Media
In every event, there are always multiple perspectives.
However, the perspective that is usually the dominantly heard one is that of
people in power. The LGBTQ community has been one that has not seen much
acceptance. Because of that, there has been bisexual erasure—the omitting of
any homosexuality in history. To fight back against this, gay communities have
created groups on social media that allow for archiving as a means of providing
a counter-narrative to the history that has been written.
The purpose of these groups is to create a community of
belonging through notions of the past and shared experiences (both past and
present). This allows for communities to share their stories, sometimes giving
alternative perspectives of historical events. With the collective memories of
many, this form of digital archiving gives members a means of connection, validation,
and maintenance of their diverse sexual identities through a platform
accessible to anyone5. Because of its public availability, people
who are not a part of this community can begin to understand the history of
other individuals whom they would have otherwise never known. It is a form of
rewriting history and opening up the door of validity for groups that are
typically marginalized and whose voices are ignored.
Being in these groups gives minorities and marginalized
groups agency. Not only that, but history transforms from the standard linear
sender-message-receiver into an interactive setting where participants have the
capacity to reframe, add to, adjust, and contribute to this record. From that,
individuals gain a sense of attachment to this community, developing their own
communal and personal identities in a way that fosters belonging through
recognition
Other social media websites, such as Grindr, have been used
and are being used to rewrite stereotypes from the past that were unrightfully
given. However, while some websites may be helping, not all are progressive
towards building a positive identity for the LGBTQ identity.
“The stigma of promiscuity in gay male culture has roots in
the respectability politics of internal responses to AIDS, as well as
homophobic responses from outside the community, and continues to haunt
discourses of gay male sexuality”[4].
During the AIDS epidemic, the gay community received a large part of the blame
because of their “promiscuous” and “hypersexual” practices. Bathhouses, random
hook ups, public sexual acts, etc. were all acts that contributed to this
epidemic and were all acts that were primarily committed by the queer
community, or at least, that’s how the public made it seem since it was a
highly heteronormative society. The reputation of promiscuity has led the gay
community to aim towards an image of “appearing just like them (heterosexuals)
through sexual moderation, monogamy and the disavowal of deviant sexual
subcultures”4. With apps such as Grindr, this makes it very
difficult for the LGBT community to release themselves from this stigma.
Although the LGBT community has scaled their way towards
acceptance, “this acceptance is conditioned on creating a public image of group
maturation where being gay is no longer associated with a sexual culture”4.
However, some may argue that doing so is just assimilating to the
heteronormative framework that this community is working against. Websites such
as Grindr have proven how the perceptions of those that do/do not use this app
are affecting/reaffirming the stereotypical identities of the LGBT community. The
past haunts many of us. We must understand the LGBTQ community’s social and
historical contexts in order to understand how we think of it now.
Activism
Individuals hold a lot of power through technology. It is a
platform by which change can and has occurred. Users have taken advantage of
the public accessibility in order to advocate for social and political change.
In society, there has been a normalization of using certain
language as an insult. This language contains words that are also used to
describe the gay community. Words such as “gay” and “faggot” are commonly used
to insult an individual. Saying it in this context implies that being gay is something
that is bad. “Gamer lingo” is what is mostly heard when playing games online.
This lingo is the normalization of offensive words. Some argue that it is just
“game talk” and does not mean anything, but studies have shown that there is a
high number of homophobic players3. Gamer lingo only adds to and
makes it harder to come out of this heteronormative structure that we are
currently in. Many comments in the game forums or those spoken over the game
are intolerant of the LGBTQ community. However, the LGBTQ community has taken
to social media and microblogging to educate society on political correctness.
Other forms of activism have been enacted through
microblogging and social media. In countries where censorship is extremely
strict, microblogging and social media has given individuals an outlet by which
they can get others to view their material before it is banned. This is
essential since, in places like China, if a person wishes to post something
LGBTQ related, it will most likely not get approved. Doing so through social
media gives individuals a window to read or watch content before it is taken
down.
In China, filmmakers have taken advantage of microblogging
and social media websites to showcase their work, spread awareness, and
validate their community. Through these Internet practices, the LGBTQ
community, known as tongzhi in China,
is able to access and promote works that validate their community. Although
much is still censored, by posting their work through these sites, it is much
more difficult to censor, easily accessible to Chinese and international
audiences, and available to more than just the tongzhi community. Thus, in a country where their offline
identities are shunned, the tongzhi
community has found a way to ensure that they are not silenced online.
In this new age where homosexuality is no longer blindly
accepted as a perversion, the tongzhi
community is finding avenues to express themselves, their identities, and to
support and advocate for equal rights. As of right now, artists of the tongzhi community are not focused on
finding fame and money. Rather, they are focused on establishing identity
within a country that is trying to drown out their voices. Much of the work,
thus, is publicly accessible and copyright issues are not so much a problem.
“Allowing such work to be publicly accessible may serve as an indicator that
such directors consider their role as tonghzi
rights activists to be more important than their role as artists”6.
For these filmmakers, their primary goal and motivation is to increase
visibility of tongzhi lives and
issues within Chinese society. In doing so [sharing and distributing queer
documentaries], they are not specifically distributing documentaries in a
physical sense, but rather are distributing their reputation, thereby affirming
their existence and drawing attention to their position in the greater online
and offline discourse”[5].
Digital identity within the LGBTQ community is not something
that individuals come by easily. This community has been marginalized for years
and is still being discriminated against. However, as times change and
technology improves, there have been an array of opportunities to begin to grow
their identity and to affirm their validity as a people. Whether it is through
social media, microblogging, videos, finding groups that make one feel
accepted, or activism, the LGBTQ community is ensuring that their voices are
not ignored and that they are seen. “The centrality of a shared history—whether
that is a history of oppression, marginalization, social distinctiveness,
inequalities or political gains over time—is central to the framework through
which belonging to a minority community operates at the intersection between relationality
and identity”[6].
See Also
Digital Identity
LGBTQ
Heteronormativity
Bisexual Erasure
Microblogging
Digital Footprint
Lifestreaming
Gay Rights Movement
[1]
Vella, Anthony Joseph. "A Digital Identity: creating uniqueness in a new
contextual domain." E-Learning and Digital Media Vol. 10,
No. 3, 2013, pp. 285-293.
[2]
Wargo, Jon M. “Every selfie tells a story: LGBTQ youth lifestreams and new
media narratives as connective identity texts.” New Media & Society, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2015, pp. 560-577.
[3]
Pulos, Alexis. “Confronting Heteronormativity in Online Games: A Critical
Discourse Analysis of LGBTQ Sexuality in World
of Warcraft.” Games and Culture,
Vol. 8, No. 2, 2013, pp. 77-97.
[4]
Ahlm, Jody. “Respectable promiscuity: Digital cruising in an era of queer
liberalism.” Sexualities, Vol. 20,
No. 3, 2016, pp. 364-379.
[5]
Shaw, Gareth and Xiaoling Zhang. “Cyberspace and gay rights in a digital China:
Queer documentary filmmaking under state censorship.” China Information, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2017, pp. 270-292.
[6]
Cover, Rob. “Memorialising queer community: digital media, subjectivity and the
Lost Gay # archives of social networking.” Media
International Australia, Vol. 00, 2017, pp. 1-10.

No comments:
Post a Comment